Christians, Christianity and the Paleo Diet. Compatible or Not?

For your weekend consumption, I encourage you to read a rather unique article which I wrote on HubPages:

Christians, Christianity and the Paleo Diet: Are they Compatible?

You have to click through to HubPages to read the article, but I would like to provide some background on it here.

I have made my position as an advocate for the paleolithic style of eating and exercise very clear.  I have researched the subject for the past year and have seen remarkable results in my own life from adopting it as a complete lifestyle.  Simultaneously, I also do not shy away from letting people know that I am a Christian.

People are fond of reminding me that grains are in the Bible.  Fair point.  Furthermore, the science behind the Paleo diet is almost entirely based on evolutionary biology, so aren't I compromising?  How can I live the way that I do without compromising my beliefs or subjecting myself to ongoing cognitive dissonance?

These were questions which, after a long enough period, I had to ask myself in a structured manner.  So I poured myself a cup of strong coffee, settled in with my Bible and my old friend, Google, and did as I always do when I want to educate myself on a subject: I read, researched, assimilated and typed out my findings.

This article was the result.  I would appreciate your reading the full story, but here is the CliffsNotes abridgment if you are pressed for time.

• Nutritionally, the Bible and the paleo diet give the same advice.  (Genesis 1:28-29, 9:1-3).
• Christ used grains and bread as a metaphor because that is what his audiences understood when he spoke to them, 2,000 years ago.  The grains of today are much different than the grains spoken of in the Bible, and now contain many harmful anti-nutrients.
• The paleo diet's reliance on an evolutionary model is rooted in its desire to express why a pre-agricultural diet is most beneficial for the human body.  Evolutionists in the paleo community state that we evolved to our physical and mental apex through a diet free of grains and other products of agriculture.  However, this fits in very well with the Biblical model as well, only in this paradigm, it simply means accepting that an Intelligent Designer created us to eat this way, and we messed it up.

I go into more detail on each of these points in the article.  You really should read it.

Christian liberty and the doctrine of love.

I am a Christian.  I was raised in a Christian home, but I chose to make my faith my own as I matured into an adult.  My reasons for choosing to maintain a faith in Christ and belief in the Bible will warrant an entry of their own at a future date, but right now I want to discuss something else. The modern incarnation of Christianity is problematic.  To be entirely honest, I usually prefer to call myself simply "a believer," because to call one's self a Christian invites a lot of misconceptions.

I read an article this morning that greatly disturbed me.  The story came from the New York Times, and gave a piercing critique of the Trinity Broadcasting Network and its financial practices.  You can click here for the full story for as long as it is freely available.

I began the draft of this piece before I read the article, but the article provides a convenient jumping-off point for my topic.  TBN is the face of modern Christianity to much of the world; they broadcast Christian programming to much of the world.  Wherever the TBN feed is accessed, viewers see a nepotistic empire making promises of God's blessings--provided that your "love offering" is sown properly.

Modern Christianity has become irrevocably tied to the culture in which it existed.  Not even religion can exist within the environment of a profit-oriented culture without taking on aspects of such a culture.  In America, the prosperity doctrine has turned Christianity into a product.

But Christianity did not start as a product!  It was not meant to be a product!  True belief is not in the false bastardization of the real thing, but in the original!

Prosperity doctrine is a purely Western invention.  It has nothing to do with scripture or the gospel; it is the belief that individual financial success is decided in the life of believers by God based on their faith and attitude.

This line of thinking is not only non-Bliblical, but extremely narrow-minded.  If it is true that one's faith determines their financial wealth, then there are thousands of South American, African, Asian and Middle Eastern believers who must believe in a lie, because they die for their faith every day, and they do so in material poverty.

Since prosperity theology is an ignorant fabrication of what a real relationship with the Lord should be like, I would like to offer a few verses of actual scripture to remind us of what true belief is about.  There is a specific way in which the Bible tells Christians to relate to one another: through love.

Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.

But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.

For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?

And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?

Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

Matthew 5:43-48

And:

Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.

And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.

If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.

If ye love me, keep my commandments.

John 14:12-15

And what commandments are these?

Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying,

Master, which is the great commandment in the law?

Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.

This is the first and great commandment.

And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

Matthew 22:35-39

These are just a few verses of many in which Christ sums up the nature of Christian living.  Christ emphasized one thing above all others: love.

Christianity is not about rules, laws or keeping a tally of rights and wrongs.  Furthermore, Christians are not given the authority by God to judge the entire world by their own standards.  There is not even one standard given to Christians for daily living except that they be in touch with God through an active relationship of prayer and study.  If a believer is seeking God and listening for his will, He will speak into the believer's life according to the believer's needs.

This is where American Christianity falls so short of healthy understanding.  Too often, Christians never read the Bible to hear God speak into their own lives as individuals.  Instead, they wait for another teacher or personality to interpret scriptures for them and give a broad, generalized statement of what is "right" or "wrong."  Naturally, guidance comes from others within the church, but if we, as flawed human beings, rely too much on other flawed human beings for guidance instead of God and his word, we are overcomplicating matters.

Christianity, at it's core, is incredibly simple.  After Christ left the earth, the apostle, Paul was faced with a problem as a church leader.  Believers who came from traditional Jewish religious backgrounds tried to enforce Judaism on the new Greek and Roman believers, pressuring them to undergo circumcision and other strictly Jewish affirmations of faith.

Paul was completely astounded that believers anywhere could be so illogical.  When salvation is freely offered through a relationship with Christ, with nothing asked in return, why would anyone even want to try to save themselves?  Paul wrote to them on the subject?

O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?

This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?

Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?

Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain.

He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?

Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.

Galatians 3:1-6

 This ties in directly with Paul's writings to the Romans, in which he stated the case just as plainly.

I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to the wise, and to the unwise.

So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also.

For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.

For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

Romans 1:14-18

This is where the heart of salvation lies.  And this is the part which is lost far too often in the American presentation of Christianity.

In the near-constant drive to increase service attendance, raise money or find media exposure (all laughably "in the name of the gospel"), the gospel message becomes secondary to the image of the speaking church or institution.  The Western church splintered itself into fragments through the creation of denominations, and now there is a sudden push to present some sterilized, standardized version of the gospel.  But as we trip over ourselves to undo years of judgment, are we really delivering the gospel?

Through their creation of a "church culture," the American Christian church lost the ability to effectively communicate their faith to non-believers without defaulting to the jargon and niche parlance of institutionalized (mass-marketed) belief.  Believer need to accept that the lingo of the church means little or nothing when repeated outside of the church, and adjust their language accordingly.  Not the message; the language.

The world doesn't need the language of judgement, denominationalism, salvation through works or anything other than love.  Christians are very good at speaking one way and acting another.  We speak the language of the New Testament, but our actions are as Old Testament as they can be.

Christ came to earth and literally sacrificed himself so that we don't have to justify ourselves through our own actions!  So why do we set up an unreachable standard for every person to whom we speak?  Non-believers shouldn't be judged the same way as believers; they haven't accepted the same standard for their lives.  Two people speaking different languages cannot agree on anything, because there is no understanding.

Christ spoke his words in Aramaic, but the meaning of his words always corresponded with the intent of his actions.  And what was it that Christ communicated in word and deed?  Love.

Plain and simple.

He spoke about love.  He asked for love in return.  And he told us to do the same.

All else is secondary.

Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?

Acts 15:10

External Links:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/05/us/tbn-fight-offers-glimpse-inside-lavish-tv-ministry.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosperity_theology

Easter versus Christmas

As a Christian, I support Easter.  I support it on the basis of principle.  Contrary to many people, I prefer it to Christmas. Ghandi once said "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”  And it is so true!  I say this as a Christian.  Christ lived his life without fanfare, without dispensing judgement on everyone he met.  He lived a life summed up by the word "love."  It staggers me how few Christians' lives can be summed up in similar terms.

Christ did not ask for His birth to be remembered.  However, he did request that we remember his death through the rite of communion.  Communion is a purely symbolic practice, and Christ laid it out in the following terms:

And when the hour was come, he sat down, and the twelve apostles with him.  And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer: For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God. And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves: For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come. And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. [Luke 22:14-20]

No such request was made for Christmas.  Christians of the more conservative persuasion often contend that the early church practice of moving into a new area, "converting" the population and remodeling the native holidays with Christian iconography, means that Christians today should not recognize these holidays at all.  Christmas, after all, is simply a replacement for pagan winter solstice holidays, and Easter, as a holiday, is tainted by lingering pagan fertility symbols.

While I would never be opposed to removing the commercial hoopla from what should be holidays of the spirit, I tend to see things along a different tack.  Rather than grasping at some desperate argument from how holidays came to be celebrated, I prefer to go back to the source material for an answer.  I realize that reading the Bible is become a novelty, what with the convenient alternatives of groupthink and popular opinion, but in the Bible, Christ himself said that he wanted his followers to remember the sacrifice he made for them.  He didn't make that request of Christmas.  Oddly enough, Christmas became the holiday most violently hijacked from its origins, extrapolated from the destitute birth of a child in a manger into a corporate juggernaut.

Meanwhile, Easter is simply a means for candy companies to break even through a few weeks of sugar-laden sales.  What a shame.  What a waste.