data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62303/62303b67708e4c23f2b1365b2245b968cf99d2ce" alt=""
True accomplishment.
It has always been my firm believe that entertainment and advertising reflect culture, and are not the root of it. Causation is hard to prove, but the correlation between films and television shows and the eras in which they were/are produced is never a coincidence. The entity known as Hollywood has a long history of providing escapism during wartime, asking questions of society during periods of cultural shift, and providing a creative outlet for those on the margins of society.
Then there's advertising. Right now, smartphone advertisements seem to be the clearest indicator of what people associate with social power. This ad in particular makes my blood boil with annoyance:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzTy9_xS1yA&feature=youtube_gdata]
What does this commercial say? How do the characters relate to each other?
- A hierarchy exists wherein the better individual is determined not by what they do for others, but by how fast their phones receive information.
- Notice also that fast access to information does not spur them on to do anything with the information except hold it over the heads of their neighbors.
- These individuals are recipients and consumers. They are not action-oriented people. Their usage of technology does not signify any real accomplishment on their part; they use the scientific advancements made and maintained by others as the basis for a misguided sense of superiority.
This is probably an unnecessarily reactionary response, but smartphone and wireless carrier advertisements seem to sum up where we have arrived as a culture. We do less, we move around less, we think less and read less. Our smart phones and back-in-a-flash data plans give us near-instant access to a literal world of information via the internet, but if pop culture is any indication, we use that access for little more than looking at kittens on youtube. Like the man and woman in the commercial above: we stay in one place, we receive and we consume.
We have lost touch with what it is to accomplish things that are meaningful and real. We don't produce. We don't wield as much interpersonal influence as we should.
Technology and mass communications are supposed to be tools for culture, but they have themselves become culture.
“We need to know who we are and if we have what it takes. What do we do now with the ultimate question? Where do we go to find an answer? In order to help you find the answer to The Question, let me as you another: What have you done with your question? Where have you taken in? You see. a man’s core question does not go away.”
- John Eldredge, Wild at Heart
Eating like adults.
When I start thinking about health, food and culture, I have a hard time stopping. Within minutes of posting about intermittent fasting, I had to go ahead and start a draft of this entry. There will be some anger.
Most of my acquaintances are maintained on a fairly transient basis. I keep very few close friends, and outside of that small sphere I often go weeks or months without seeing many other people. Given these circumstances, my dramatic weight loss last summer surprised a lot of people when they saw me again in the fall. The inevitable question came often: "how did you do it?" And they still come often. The questions have come for so long by now that my response is barely more than a grunt and an email containing a link to Mark's Daily Apple.
Americans' general lack of culture-wide health consciousness is revealed in the way that people almost always follow the same script with the questions they ask. And it drives me batty. Everyone is still influenced by what "authoritative" sources have told us about low-fat and heart disease, but this leads to worry and confusion when confronted by the success seen in high-fat diets like Atkins or the Primal Blueprint/paleo lifestyle.
For the latter half of the twentieth century to the present, Americans have been steadily gaining weight and making concerted efforts to lose it. And, in our defense, our culture does not help this pursuit. Our entire system of food business, subsidized grain crops, additives, long-term shipping and storage of produce, factory farms, processed foods and the fructose industry all work in concert to create an environment which lends itself much more easily to an unhealthy population than a healthy one. The icing on the cake is the misinformation that, for forty years, has dominated weight loss and nutrition advisement.
Medical science, historically, evolves and changes over time as new research finds the flaws in old research and the accepted standards are amended accordingly. In the 1970s, the research surrounding weight control and heart disease was latched onto by the government and incorporated it into the recommendations on what US citizens should and shouldn't be eating. This occurred at the same time as the creation of farm subsidies and the corn and soy industries. Matters of health were made into matters of business and government policies. Today, far too many doctors still operate off of their med school training from thirty years ago, or longer, while "nutritionists" speak from the same tired script as the docs.
And this is why I grow so angry with the people with whom I come into contact. The food pyramid was tried, and it failed. Low-fat diets were tested for forty years and also failed in their turn. But the morbidly obese, still excusing themselves as "big boned" and "genetically disadvantaged," like the mouth-breathing groupthinkers they too often tend to be, stubbornly cling to the exhausted notion that "heart healthy whole grains" and "low fat" variations on pizza and snack foods are the route to good health and fitness.
In the age of the internet, if you truly care about how look, feel or eat, you have no excuse to be misinformed. When you are still quoting research from forty or fifty years ago and claiming authority on the subject of weight loss, don't be offended when I laugh in your face. To discredit my experience is disrespectful. To deny science is ignorance.
But above all, don't ask for me to waste time explaining my lifestyle to you if your response is going to be "I could never do that."
Hmm. One expresses their desire for a change, but simultaneously proclaims their weakness and pre-accepted inability to execute said change. That's a self-fulfilling prophecy right there.
Think of it this way, and perhaps you will understand my lack of patience. There is a group of people who allow emotion and the pleasure of the moment to dictate their choices. They like sweet things and fun foods sold in brightly-colored packages. In the grand old American tradition of "if some is good, then more is better," they desire their sweeties in large amounts, and they get complain when they can't get them.
In almost any other context, we would be talking about children.
However, in the realm of lifestyle and nutrition, this mentality is an accurate description of most adults. Despite their age and supposed maturity, too many adults are downright unwilling to accept the facts when confronted with evidence that our American food culture is a business which sells poor health in the long run.
Steady weight gain occurs from an unhealthy lifestyle. A short-term diet is a temporary fix. Long-term weight loss and weight maintenance requires an acceptance of these facts and permanent changes in lifestyle. Nothing exists in a vacuum.
We have every resource available to us, and there are people like me who are walking proof that a little bit of time spent researching health can yield amazing benefits in a relatively short amount of time.
If you are one of those people who complained of "those ten pounds" so long that they've had time to multiply into twenty, it is time to stop looking for easy fixes and annoying the rest of us with your repetitive complaints. It is your responsibility. Not your environment, not genetics, not your family history. It is your responsibility. And in the age of endless free resources on the internet, you have no excuse.